A data-rich wine sector with hidden questions of power
Germany should be read as a wine ecosystem rather than as a list of wineries. The sector includes vineyards, family holdings, wineries, cooperatives, cellar operations, regional wine associations, retail, hospitality, wine tourism, wine education, communication, distribution and support services. This ecosystem has different work settings, from small family holdings to larger companies and from vineyards to customer-facing environments.
The country’s official statistics provide a comparatively strong view of the production base. The largest listed quality wine-growing regions by vineyard area in 2025 were Rheinhessen, Pfalz, Baden, Württemberg and Mosel. These regions are not only production territories; they are also rural workplaces, education spaces, tourism destinations and local economies where prevention messages and support information need to be visible. [5]
Germany in brief
Table 1. Germany in brief. Values compiled from Destatis and BMEL/BLE public sources. See References 1–9.
A small-scale structure requiring practical tools
Germany’s vineyard structure is not defined by one type of actor. In 2023, holdings with less than 5 hectares of vineyard area represented about 60% of all vineyard holdings, but accounted for only about 14% of vineyard area. By contrast, holdings of 20 hectares or more represented about 8.5% of holdings, while accounting for about 41% of vineyard area. [6]
This structure matters for GBV prevention and workplace equality. Larger companies and larger holdings may have more formal HR systems, works councils, compliance processes or management capacity. Smaller and family-based holdings may need tools that are shorter, practical, low-cost and distributed through trusted intermediaries: regional associations, chambers, cooperatives, training institutions, business support organisations and women’s networks.
Women in German wine: visible in the pipeline, less measurable in power
The public data available for Germany does not provide a consolidated count of wine-sector companies owned by women or managed by women. This should not be hidden. It is one of the main findings of the report: Germany can measure many features of the sector, but women’s ownership, management and workplace protection in wine are still not publicly visible in the same way.
At the same time, women are clearly present in the wider agricultural workforce and in the wine-sector talent pipeline. BMEL statistics show that women represented around 35% of the agricultural workforce and 44% of seasonal agricultural workers in 2023. DWI data show that the share of women among new viticulture trainees increased from 24% to 30% across two five-year periods, and that women accounted for 46% of newly enrolled students in wine-related Bachelor programmes in winter semester 2024/25. [9, 10]
For the Observatory, these signals should be read together. Germany does not lack women in the sector. The open question is whether women’s growing presence in training, seasonal work, family labour, communication, tourism and professional networks leads to recognised authority, safe reporting routes and leadership opportunities.
Data transparency: what can be seen and what remains invisible
Germany can describe vineyard area, production, regional concentration, holdings, labour categories and several gender-related agricultural indicators with strong public sources. It cannot yet describe, with the same precision, women-owned wineries, women-managed wineries, women in wine-sector governance, wine-sector-specific harassment or GBV reports, gender pay gaps in wine companies, or the availability of confidential reporting channels across the sector.
This limitation is not a weakness of the report; it is part of the Observatory agenda.